<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://undertheinfluence.me.uk" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Under The Influence - post-rock</title>
 <link>http://undertheinfluence.me.uk/taxonomy/term/34/0</link>
 <description></description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Mark Hollis - Mark Hollis</title>
 <link>http://undertheinfluence.me.uk/music/mark_hollis/mark_hollis</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I was daydreaming as I walked to work the other day, as one often does. I was thinking about Mark Hollis, then about Talk Talk, then finally Laughing Stock. That&#039;s why I brought this album, because my thoughts warmed up as I thought about how Laughing Stock was once in my Top 5. Thinking about it, I&#039;m not too sure that&#039;s changed at all. I haven&#039;t attempted to create a Top 5 albums list in years - probably because it would be a fruitless and depressing activity.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This album is beautiful. It&#039;s a lot like Laughing Stock I guess. Meandering. With later Hollis work you basically get mellow acoustic production with splashes of dreamy vocals, ebbs and flows. Thinking about it now it&#039;s just dawned on me that Talk Talk must have been instrumental in the creation of the post-rock genre. The elements were already all there by Spirit of Eden.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Damn, what a pretty little piece. Hollis&#039; work is all about the space. You never fell rushed, the silences (and there are plenty of them) give you time to stop and think.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Yeah, I think Mark Hollis will stay in my Top 5 for another few years yet.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://undertheinfluence.me.uk/music/mark_hollis/mark_hollis#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://undertheinfluence.me.uk/tags/1998">1998</category>
 <category domain="http://undertheinfluence.me.uk/style/avant_garde">avant-garde</category>
 <category domain="http://undertheinfluence.me.uk/style/post_rock">post-rock</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 18:41:50 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>aidan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">123 at http://undertheinfluence.me.uk</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Jakob - Cale:Drew</title>
 <link>http://undertheinfluence.me.uk/music/jakob/cale_drew</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Jakob have been in my life for more years (10?) than I can remember now and I wouldn&#039;t have it any other way. As a cheap comparison you could say that they sound something like [insert post-rock group here]. I guess the elements are there - pounding drums set the scene while lush layers of guitar noise swirl overhead.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To see Jakob perform live is a semi-religious experience for me. It seems to take a good couple of seconds for the sound to find its way from Jeff&#039;s guitar to the listeners ears. What is it doing inside all those pedals? Biding its time, swirling around until it&#039;s ripe. Only then can be considered mature enough for our ears.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The variance in dynamics across the album, or even within a single song, is huge. Some of it ambient, hauntingly beautiful while other bits use their hard edge to provide a great contrast. They don&#039;t take the approach of other post-rock bands - it&#039;s not a slow growing organic build up of noise. When Jakob want you to have it, they just let you have it. And I highly suggest you just sit there and take it.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://undertheinfluence.me.uk/music/jakob/cale_drew#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://undertheinfluence.me.uk/tags/2003">2003</category>
 <category domain="http://undertheinfluence.me.uk/tags/nz">nz</category>
 <category domain="http://undertheinfluence.me.uk/style/post_rock">post-rock</category>
 <category domain="http://undertheinfluence.me.uk/tags/seen_live">seen-live</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 15:43:58 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>aidan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">20 at http://undertheinfluence.me.uk</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
